Thursday, June 25, 2015
Youcat commented through CCC. Question n. 42 – Part III.
(Youcat answer - repeated) Yes. Although it is a
different kind of knowledge, faith is open to the findings and hypotheses of
the sciences.
A deepening through
CCC
(CCC 286) Human intelligence is surely already capable of
finding a response to the question of origins. The existence of God the Creator
can be known with certainty through his works, by the light of human reason
(Cf. Vatican Council I, can. 2 § I: DS 3026) even if this knowledge is often
obscured and disfigured by error. This is why faith comes to confirm and
enlighten reason in the correct understanding of this truth: "By faith we
understand that the world was created by the word of God, so that what is seen
was made out of things which do not appear" (Heb 11:3).
Reflecting and
meditating
(Youcat comment)
Theology has no scientific competence,
and natural science has no theological competence. Natural science cannot
dogmatically rule out the possibility that there are purposeful processes in
creation; conversely, faith cannot define specifically how these processes take
place in the course of nature’s development. A Christian can accept the theory
of evolution as a helpful explanatory model, provided he does not fall into the
heresy of evolutionism, which views man as the random product of biological
processes. Evolution presupposes the existence of something that can develop.
The theory says nothing about where this “something” came from. Furthermore,
questions about the being, essence, dignity, mission, meaning, and wherefore of
the world and man cannot be answered in biological terms. Just as
“evolutionism” oversteps a boundary on the one side, so does “creationism” on
the other. Creationists naïvely take biblical data literally (for example, to
calculate the earth’s age, they cite the six days of work in Genesis 1).
(CCC Comment)
(CCC 287) The truth about creation is so important for all
of human life that God in his tenderness wanted to reveal to his People
everything that is salutary to know on the subject. Beyond the natural
knowledge that every man can have of the Creator (Cf. Acts 17:24-29; Rom
1:19-20), God progressively revealed to Israel the mystery of creation. He who
chose the patriarchs, who brought Israel out of Egypt, and who by choosing
Israel created and formed it, this same God reveals himself as the One to whom
belong all the peoples of the earth, and the whole earth itself; he is the One
who alone "made heaven and earth" (Cf. Isa 43:1; Pss 115:15; 124:8;
134:3).
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Youcat commented through CCC. Question n. 42 – Part II.
YOUCAT Question n. 42 - Part II. Can someone accept the theory of evolution and still believe in the Creator?
(Youcat answer - repeated) Yes. Although it is a
different kind of knowledge, faith is open to the findings and hypotheses of
the sciences.
A deepening through
CCC
(CCC 282) Catechesis on creation is of major importance. It
concerns the very foundations of human and Christian life: for it makes
explicit the response of the Christian faith to the basic question that men of
all times have asked themselves (Cf. NA 2): "Where do we come from?" "Where
are we going?" "What is our origin?" "What is our
end?" "Where does everything that exists come from and where is it
going?" the two questions, the first about the origin and the second about
the end, are inseparable. They are decisive for the meaning and orientation of
our life and actions. (CCC 288) Thus the revelation of creation is inseparable
from the revelation and forging of the covenant of the one God with his People.
Creation is revealed as the first step towards this covenant, the first and
universal witness to God's all-powerful love (Cf. Gen 15:5; Jer 33:19-26). And
so, the truth of creation is also expressed with growing vigour in the message
of the prophets, the prayer of the psalms and the liturgy, and in the wisdom
sayings of the Chosen People (Cf. Isa 44:24; Ps 104; Prov 8:22-31).
Reflecting and
meditating
(Youcat comment)
Theology has no scientific competence,
and natural science has no theological competence. Natural science cannot
dogmatically rule out the possibility that there are purposeful processes in
creation; conversely, faith cannot define specifically how these processes take
place in the course of nature’s development. A Christian can accept the theory
of evolution as a helpful explanatory model, provided he does not fall into the
heresy of evolutionism, which views man as the random product of biological
processes. Evolution presupposes the existence of something that can develop.
The theory says nothing about where this “something” came from. Furthermore,
questions about the being, essence, dignity, mission, meaning, and wherefore of
the world and man cannot be answered in biological terms. Just as
“evolutionism” oversteps a boundary on the one side, so does “creationism” on
the other. Creationists naïvely take biblical data literally (for example, to
calculate the earth’s age, they cite the six days of work in Genesis 1).
(CCC Comment)
(CCC 289) Among all the Scriptural texts about creation, the
first three chapters of Genesis occupy a unique place. From a literary standpoint
these texts may have had diverse sources. The inspired authors have placed them
at the beginning of Scripture to express in their solemn language the truths of
creation - its origin and its end in God, its order and goodness, the vocation
of man, and finally the drama of sin and the hope of salvation. Read in the
light of Christ, within the unity of Sacred Scripture and in the living
Tradition of the Church, these texts remain the principal source for catechesis
on the mysteries of the "beginning": creation, fall, and promise of
salvation.
(This question: Can someone accept the theory of evolution and still believe in the Creator? is continued)
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Youcat commented through CCC. Question n. 42 – Part I.
YOUCAT Question n. 42 - Part I. Can someone accept the theory of evolution and still believe in the Creator?
(Youcat answer) Yes. Although it is a different kind of
knowledge, faith is open to the findings and hypotheses of the sciences.
A deepening through
CCC
(CCC 283) The question about the origins of the world and of
man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly
enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development
of life-forms and the appearance of man. These discoveries invite us to even
greater admiration for the greatness of the Creator, prompting us to give him
thanks for all his works and for the understanding and wisdom he gives to
scholars and researchers. With Solomon they can say: "It is he who gave me
unerring knowledge of what exists, to know the structure of the world and the
activity of the elements… for wisdom, the fashioner of all things, taught
me" (Wis 7: 17-22).
Reflecting and
meditating
(Youcat comment)
Theology has no scientific competence,
and natural science has no theological competence. Natural science cannot
dogmatically rule out the possibility that there are purposeful processes in
creation; conversely, faith cannot define specifically how these processes take
place in the course of nature’s development. A Christian can accept the theory
of evolution as a helpful explanatory model, provided he does not fall into the
heresy of evolutionism, which views man as the random product of biological
processes. Evolution presupposes the existence of something that can develop.
The theory says nothing about where this “something” came from. Furthermore,
questions about the being, essence, dignity, mission, meaning, and wherefore of
the world and man cannot be answered in biological terms. Just as
“evolutionism” oversteps a boundary on the one side, so does “creationism” on
the other. Creationists naïvely take biblical data literally (for example, to
calculate the earth’s age, they cite the six days of work in Genesis 1).
(CCC Comment)
(CCC 284) The great interest accorded to these studies is
strongly stimulated by a question of another order, which goes beyond the
proper domain of the natural sciences. It is not only a question of knowing
when and how the universe arose physically, or when man appeared, but rather of
discovering the meaning of such an origin: is the universe governed by chance,
blind fate, anonymous necessity, or by a transcendent, intelligent and good
Being called "God"? and if the world does come from God's wisdom and
goodness, why is there evil? Where does it come from? Who is responsible for
it? Is there any liberation from it?
(This question: Can someone accept the theory of evolution and still believe in the Creator? is continued)
Monday, June 22, 2015
Youcat commented through CCC. Question n. 41 – Part III.
YOUCAT Question n. 41 - Part III. Does science make the Creator superfluous?
(Youcat answer -
repeated) No. The sentence “God created the world” is not an outmoded
scientific statement. We are dealing here with a theo-logical statement,
therefore a statement about the divine meaning (theos = God, logos = meaning)
and origin of things.
A deepening through
CCC
(CCC 284) The great interest accorded to these studies is
strongly stimulated by a question of another order, which goes beyond the
proper domain of the natural sciences. It is not only a question of knowing
when and how the universe arose physically, or when man appeared, but rather of
discovering the meaning of such an origin: is the universe governed by chance,
blind fate, anonymous necessity, or by a transcendent, intelligent and good
Being called "God"? and if the world does come from God's wisdom and
goodness, why is there evil? Where does it come from? Who is responsible for
it? Is there any liberation from it? (CCC 282) Catechesis on creation is of
major importance. It concerns the very foundations of human and Christian life:
for it makes explicit the response of the Christian faith to the basic question
that men of all times have asked themselves (Cf. NA 2): "Where do we come
from?" "Where are we going?" "What is our origin?"
"What is our end?" "Where does everything that exists come from
and where is it going?" the two questions, the first about the origin and
the second about the end, are inseparable. They are decisive for the meaning
and orientation of our life and actions.
Reflecting and
meditating
(Youcat comment)
The creation account is not a scientific
model for explaining the beginning of the world. “God created the world” is a
theological statement that is concerned with the relation of the world to God.
God willed the world; he sustains it and will perfect it. Being created is a
lasting quality in things and an fundamental truth about them.
(CCC Comment)
(CCC 287) The truth
about creation is so important for all of human life that God in his tenderness
wanted to reveal to his People everything that is salutary to know on the
subject. Beyond the natural knowledge that every man can have of the Creator
(Cf. Acts 17:24-29; Rom 1:19-20), God progressively revealed to Israel the
mystery of creation. He who chose the patriarchs, who brought Israel out of
Egypt, and who by choosing Israel created and formed it, this same God reveals
himself as the One to whom belong all the peoples of the earth, and the whole
earth itself; he is the One who alone "made heaven and earth" (Cf.
Isa 43:1; Pss 115:15; 124:8; 134:3).
(The next question is: Can someone accept the theory of evolution and still believe in the Creator?)
Sunday, June 21, 2015
Youcat commented through CCC. Question n. 41 – Part II.
YOUCAT Question n. 41 - Part II. Does science make the Creator superfluous?
(Youcat answer - repeated) No. The sentence “God created
the world” is not an outmoded scientific statement. We are dealing here with a
theo-logical statement, therefore a statement about the divine meaning (theos =
God, logos = meaning) and origin of things.
A deepening through
CCC
(CCC 286) Human intelligence is surely already capable of
finding a response to the question of origins. The existence of God the Creator
can be known with certainty through his works, by the light of human reason
(Cf. Vatican Council I, can. 2 § I: DS 3026) even if this knowledge is often
obscured and disfigured by error. This is why faith comes to confirm and
enlighten reason in the correct understanding of this truth: "By faith we
understand that the world was created by the word of God, so that what is seen
was made out of things which do not appear" (Heb 11:3).
Reflecting and
meditating
(Youcat comment)
The creation account is not a scientific
model for explaining the beginning of the world. “God created the world” is a
theological statement that is concerned with the relation of the world to God.
God willed the world; he sustains it and will perfect it. Being created is a
lasting quality in things and an fundamental truth about them.
(CCC Comment)
(CCC 288) Thus the revelation of creation is inseparable
from the revelation and forging of the covenant of the one God with his People.
Creation is revealed as the first step towards this covenant, the first and
universal witness to God's all-powerful love (Cf. Gen 15:5; Jer 33:19-26). And
so, the truth of creation is also expressed with growing vigour in the message
of the prophets, the prayer of the psalms and the liturgy, and in the wisdom
sayings of the Chosen People (Cf. Isa 44:24; Ps 104; Prov 8:22-31). (CCC 289)
Among all the Scriptural texts about creation, the first three chapters of
Genesis occupy a unique place. From a literary standpoint these texts may have
had diverse sources. The inspired authors have placed them at the beginning of
Scripture to express in their solemn language the truths of creation - its
origin and its end in God, its order and goodness, the vocation of man, and
finally the drama of sin and the hope of salvation. Read in the light of
Christ, within the unity of Sacred Scripture and in the living Tradition of the
Church, these texts remain the principal source for catechesis on the mysteries
of the "beginning": creation, fall, and promise of salvation.
(This question: Does science make the Creator superfluous? is continued)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)