Wednesday, November 25, 2015
Youcat commented through CCC - Question n. 96 - Part I.
(Youcat
answer) Jesus posed a decisive question to his contemporaries: Either he was
acting with divine authority, or else he was an impostor, a blasphemer, and a
violator of the Law and who had to be called to account.
A deepening through CCC
(CCC 574)
From the beginning of Jesus' public ministry, certain Pharisees and partisans
of Herod together with priests and scribes agreed together to destroy him (Cf. Mk 3:6; 14:1). Because of certain of his
acts - expelling demons, forgiving sins, healing on the sabbath day, his novel
interpretation of the precepts of the Law regarding purity, and his familiarity
with tax collectors and public sinners (Cf. Mt 12:24; Mk 2:7, 14-17; 3:1-6;
7:14-23) - some ill-intentioned persons suspected Jesus of demonic possession
(Cf. Mk 3:22; Jn 8:48; 10:20). He is accused of blasphemy and false prophecy,
religious crimes which the Law punished with death by stoning (Cf. Mk 2:7; Jn
5:18; 7:12; 7:52; 8:59; 10:31, 33). 574
Reflecting and meditating
(Youcat comment) In many
respects Jesus was a unprecedented challenge to the traditional Judaism of his
time. He forgave sins, which God alone can do; he acted as though the Sabbath
law were not absolute; he was suspected of blasphemy and brought upon himself
the accusation that he was a false prophet. All these were crimes punishable
under the Law by death.
(CCC Comment)
(CCC 576)
In the eyes of many in Israel, Jesus seems to be acting against essential
institutions of the Chosen People: - submission to the whole of the Law in its
written commandments and, for the Pharisees, in the interpretation of oral
tradition; - the centrality of the Temple at Jerusalem as the holy place where
God's presence dwells in a special way; - faith in the one God whose glory no
man can share.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment