Friday, May 19, 2017
Youcat commented through CCC – Question n. 292 – Part I.
(Youcat
answer) No, we may never deliberately do something evil or tolerate an evil so
that good can result from it. Sometimes there is no other course of action but to
tolerate a lesser evil in order to prevent a greater evil.
A deepening through CCC
(CCC 1755) A morally good act requires the goodness
of the object, of the end, and of the circumstances together. An evil end
corrupts the action, even if the object is good in itself (such as praying and
fasting "in order to be seen by men"). The object of the choice can by itself vitiate an act in its entirety.
There are some concrete acts - such as fornication - that it is always wrong to
choose, because choosing them entails a disorder of the will, that is, a moral
evil.
Reflecting and meditating
(Youcat comment) The end does not justify the means. It
cannot be right to commit infidelity so as to stabilize one’s marriage. It is
just as wrong to use embryos for stem cell research, even if one could thereby
make medical breakthroughs. It is wrong to try to “help” a rape victim by
aborting her child.
(CCC Comment)
(CCC 1759) "An evil action cannot be justified by reference
to a good intention" (cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, Dec. praec. 6). The end does not justify the means.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment