Thursday, April 18, 2013
469. What kind of punishment may be imposed?
(Comp 469) The punishment imposed must be proportionate to the gravity of the offense.
Given the possibilities which the State now has for effectively preventing
crime by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm,
the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity “are
very rare, if not practically non-existent.” (Evangelium Vitae). When
non-lethal means are sufficient, authority should limit itself to such means
because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good,
are more in conformity with the dignity of the human person, and do not remove
definitively from the guilty party the possibility of reforming himself.
“In brief”
(CCC 1896) Where sin has perverted the social climate, it is
necessary to call for the conversion of hearts and appeal to the grace of God.
Charity urges just reforms. There is no solution to the social question apart
from the Gospel (cf. CA 3, 5).
To deepen and
explain
(CCC 2267) Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and
responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the
Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible
way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor. If, however,
non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people’s safety from the
aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in
keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in
conformity with the dignity of the human person. Today, in fact, as a
consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing
crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm - without
definitively taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself – the cases
in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity “are very rare,
if not practically non-existent” (John Paul II, Evangelium vitae 56).
Reflection
(CCC 2306) Those who renounce violence and bloodshed and, in
order to safeguard human rights, make use of those means of defense available
to the weakest, bear witness to evangelical charity, provided they do so
without harming the rights and obligations of other men and societies. They
bear legitimate witness to the gravity of the physical and moral risks of
recourse to violence, with all its destruction and death (Cf. GS 78 § 5).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment