Monday, April 22, 2013
470. What is forbidden by the fifth commandment? (part 4 continuation)
(Comp 470 repetition) The fifth commandment forbids as gravely contrary to the moral law: *
direct and intentional murder and cooperation in it; * direct abortion, willed
as an end or as means, as well as cooperation in it. Attached to this sin is
the penalty of excommunication because, from the moment of his or her
conception, the human being must be absolutely respected and protected in his
integrity; * direct euthanasia which consists in putting an end to the life of
the handicapped, the sick, or those near death by an act or by the omission of
a required action; * suicide and voluntary cooperation in it, insofar as it is
a grave offense against the just love of God, of self, and of neighbor. One’s
responsibility may be aggravated by the scandal given; one who is
psychologically disturbed or is experiencing grave fear may have diminished responsibility.
“In brief”
(CCC 2324) Intentional euthanasia,
whatever its forms or motives, is murder. It is gravely contrary to the dignity
of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator.
To deepen and
explain
(CCC 2276) Those whose lives are diminished or weakened
deserve special respect. Sick or handicapped persons should be helped to lead
lives as normal as possible. (CCC 2277) Whatever its motives and means, direct
euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or
dying persons. It is morally unacceptable. Thus an act or omission which, of
itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering
constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to
the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into
which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous
act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.
Reflection
(CCC 2278) Discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome,
dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be
legitimate; it is the refusal of "over-zealous" treatment. Here one
does not will to cause death; one's inability to impede it is merely accepted.
The decisions should be made by the patient if he is competent and able or, if
not, by those legally entitled to act for the patient, whose reasonable will
and legitimate interests must always be respected. (CCC 2279) Even if death is
thought imminent, the ordinary care owed to a sick person cannot be
legitimately interrupted. The use of painkillers to alleviate the sufferings of
the dying, even at the risk of shortening their days, can be morally in
conformity with human dignity if death is not willed as either an end or a means,
but only foreseen and tolerated as inevitable. Palliative care is a special
form of disinterested charity. As such it should be encouraged. [IT CONTINUES]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment