Sunday, November 9, 2014
Lk 20, 9-16 + CSDC and CV
Luke 20, 9-16 +
CSDC and CV
CV 54b Relationships between human beings
throughout history cannot but be enriched by reference to this divine model. In
particular, in the light of the revealed mystery of the Trinity, we
understand that true openness does not mean loss of individual identity but
profound interpenetration. This also emerges from the common human experiences
of love and truth. Just as the sacramental love of spouses unites them
spiritually in “one flesh” (Gen 2:24; Mt 19:5; Eph 5:31) and makes out of the
two a real and relational unity, so in an analogous way truth unites spirits
and causes them to think in unison, attracting them as a unity to itself.
CDS 280 One must not fall into the error of thinking
that the process of overcoming the dependence of work on material is of itself
capable of overcoming alienation in the workplace or the alienation of labour.
The reference here is not only to the many pockets of non-work, concealed work,
child labour, underpaid work, exploitation of workers — all of which still
persist today — but also to new, much more subtle forms of exploitation of new
sources of work, to over-working, to work-as-career that often takes on more
importance than other human and necessary aspects, to excessive demands of work
that makes family life unstable and sometimes impossible, to a modular
structure of work that entails the risk of serious repercussions on the unitary
perception of one's own existence and the stability of family relationships. If
people are alienated when means and ends are inverted, elements of alienation
can also be found in the new contexts of work that is immaterial, light,
qualitative more than quantitative, “either through increased sharing in a
genuinely supportive community or through increased isolation in a maze of
relationships marked by destructive competitiveness and estrangement”.[603]
Notes: [603] John Paul II, Encyclical
Letter Centesimus Annus, 41: AAS 83 (1991), 844.
[9] Then he proceeded to tell the people this parable.
"(A) man planted a vineyard, leased it to tenant farmers, and then went on
a journey for a long time. [10] At harvest time he sent a servant to the tenant
farmers to receive some of the produce of the vineyard. But they beat the
servant and sent him away empty-handed. [11] So he proceeded to send another
servant, but him also they beat and insulted and sent away empty-handed. [12]
Then he proceeded to send a third, but this one too they wounded and threw out.
[13] The owner of the vineyard said, 'What shall I do? I shall send my beloved
son; maybe they will respect him.' [14] But when the tenant farmers saw him
they said to one another, 'This is the heir. Let us kill him that the
inheritance may become ours.' [15] So they threw him out of the vineyard and
killed him. What will the owner of the vineyard do to them? [16] He will come
and put those tenant farmers to death and turn over the vineyard to
others." When the people heard this, they exclaimed, "Let it not be
so!"
CDS 390 The profound meaning of civil and political life
does not arise immediately from the list of personal rights and duties. Life in
society takes on all its significance when it is based on civil friendship and
on fraternity.[790] The sphere of rights, in fact, is that of safeguarded
interests, external respect, the protection of material goods and their
distribution according to established rules. The sphere of friendship, on the
other hand, is that selflessness, detachment from material goods, giving freely
and inner acceptance of the needs of others.[791] Civil friendship [792]
understood in this way is the most genuine actualization of the principle of
fraternity, which is inseparable from that of freedom and equality.[793] In
large part, this principle has not been put into practice in the concrete
circumstances of modern political society, above all because of the influence
of individualistic and collectivistic ideologies.
Notes: [790]
Cf. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Sententiae Octavi Libri Ethicorum, VIII, lect.
1: Ed. Leon. 47, 443: “Est enim naturalis amicitia inter eos qui sunt unius
gentis ad invicem, inquantum communicant in moribus et convictu. Quartam
rationem ponit ibi: Videtur autem et civitates continere amicitia. Et
dicit quod per amicitiam videntur conservari civitates. Unde legislatores magis
student ad amicitiam conservandam inter cives quam etiam ad iustitiam, quam
quandoque intermittunt, puta in poenis inferendis, ne dissensio oriatur. Et hoc
patet per hoc quod concordia assimulatur amicitiae, quam quidem, scilicet
concordiam, legislatores maxime appetunt, contentionem autem civium maxime
expellunt, quasi inimicam salutis civitatis. Et quia tota moralis philosophia
videtur ordinari ad bonum civile, ut in principio dictum est, pertinet ad
moralem considerare de amicitia”. [791] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church,
2212-2213. [792] Cf. Saint Thomas Aquinas, De Regno. Ad Regem Cypri, I,
10: Ed. Leon. 42, 461: “omnis autem amicitia super aliqua communione firmatur:
eos enim qui conueniunt uel per nature originem uel per morum similitudinem uel
per cuiuscumque communionem, uidemus amicitia coniungi... Non enim conseruatur
amore, cum parua uel nulla sit amicitia subiecte multitudinis ad tyrannum, ut
prehabitis patet”. [793] ”Liberty, equality, fraternity” was the motto of the
French Revolution. “In the final analysis, these are Christian ideas”, John
Paul II affirmed during his first visit to France: Homily at Le Bourget (1 June
1980), 5: AAS 72 (1980), 720.
[Initials and Abbreviations.- CSDC: Pontifical Council for
Justice And Peace, Compendium
of the Social Doctrine of the Church; - SDC:
Social Doctrine of the Church; - CV: Benedict
XVI, Caritas in Veritate (Charity in truth)]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment